Net nanny reviews 2016 how to#

Let’s hope it won’t become a model for Poland. The most restrictive country in this regard is Hungary. However, mass media widely reported restrictions imposed on school shops and dishes served in school canteens. In Poland, restrictions in this area are few. The last component of the index measures restrictions on food and non-alcoholic beverages, for example, additional taxes or limits on ingredients such as sugar or fats.

Poland returned to the top ten countries with the highest value of the Nanny State Index in the category of alcohol, which measures the amount of taxes, advertising bans and restrictions on the promotional sale of alcohol in shops and bars. It amends the law on the protection of health against the effects of tobacco and tobacco products by introducing a number of restrictions on the consumption and sale of e-cigarettes. However, its position significantly deteriorated when the Act of July 22, 2016, came into force. A year ago, Poland was among the least restrictive EU countries in this respect. The second component concerns e-cigarettes. In this regard, the restrictiveness of Polish regulations is close to the EU average. It measures, among others, rates of taxation, advertising restrictions, and the scope of non-smoking ban. The first component concerns tobacco products. The value of the index for 2016 increased for 22 out of 26 EU countries. The higher their values, the more paternalistic and therefore overprotective is the country. The Nanny State Index, the index of state paternalism, consists of four components. It is worth using such indexes to make a real assessment of the effects of existing and planned regulations – he adds. Will this trend of increasing state paternalism continue to deepen at the expense of individual freedom and responsibility? The announcements of some politicians and officials indicate that the risk is real. In the current edition, Poland ranks as an even more restrictive country than before, mainly due to changes in the law on e-cigarettes. Adults should have much more freedom in deciding what and where they want to eat, drink or smoke – says Marek Tatała, Vice-President of the Board, Civic Development Forum (FOR). Here, we are dealing not only with limiting freedom of individuals but also with the destruction of their sense of responsibility for themselves.

Net nanny reviews 2016 how to#

Politicians introduce restrictive paternalism to replace systems where adults decide for themselves how to use certain products, enjoying their ability to choose and bearing personal consequences of their choices.Īnother edition of The Nanny State Index shows once again how far politicians go in controlling our daily lives. Not only it limits people’s freedom but also destroys their responsibility. conviction of politicians and officials that they know better what is good and bad for others, and how people should shape their lives. Restrictions are often justified by state paternalism, i.e. Taxes levied on various substances along with the standard VAT tax increase the income of the state budget on the one hand, and discourage their consumption on the other. marijuana), but also, to a growing extent, to sweets, sweet drinks or the size of packs of medicines available outside pharmacies or over-the-counter.

This does not apply only to substances that are commonly associated with restrictive national policies, such as cigarettes, alcohol or other stimulants (e.g. Just like last time, also in 2016, the lightest restrictions were recorded in the Czech Republic and Germany.įor years, politicians and state regulators have been creating and implementing a number of laws that define what, where, and at what price we can eat, drink or smoke.

New restrictions put Poland in the ninth place in the latest ranking (worse than last year’s 15th position).įinland and the United Kingdom remained at the top of the table, as well as Ireland, which moved up to no.

The higher the position in the ranking, the more restrictive the laws. The index evaluates restrictiveness of regulations governing the sale and consumption of food, soft drinks, alcohol, tobacco, and e-cigarettes in 28 EU countries in 2016. The European think tank network EPICENTER (the European Policy Information Center) has published the second edition of The Nanny State Index, an indicator of state paternalism in the European Union.